- Evidence
- First message at 0.80 s, price and book at 2.77 s on 1 October. 3 October recorded load: first frame received at 0.38 s, price at 2.73 s, book at 3.28 s. The fastest page in the test still spends most of its load between data and paint. About 1.0 s of main-thread script time in the 1 October capture is not attributed to any script. A lead from the same app's options screen, recorded logged out with a CPU profile: a 437 ms task at 0.60 s with about 107 ms sampled inside the translation runtime (vue-i18n.runtime-ByYFhQH0.js), in both of its two recordings. The perpetuals screen shares that code, so it is the first place to look.
- Gap observed
- 2.0 s between the first socket message and the price on 1 October; 2.3 s on 3 October
- Holds back
- Price (median 1.4 s in the timed loads), book (median 1.7 s in the timed loads).
- Fix
- Profile the 2 s between the first socket message and the first price paint, starting with the translation runtime (vue-i18n) set-up; render price and book from the first snapshot before the remaining layout mounts.
- Where
- Vue app start-up and the trading layout; the largest start-up scripts are index-CKxRR9q7.js (1.5 MB unpacked), namespaced-BVOXSsx0.js (0.2 MB) and webApi-COfZ-cAG.js (0.2 MB).
- Verify
- DevTools → Performance: price paint within 200 ms of the first ticker message.
Thalex: where its trading screen loses time, and what to fix
Measured from the Netherlands in a logged-in Chrome, October 2026.
Three measurements appear on this page, and their times differ. Rank and results come from the campaign's timed reloads. The diagnostic capture and the recorded reload are single loads made with recording switched on, which slows the page: read them for the order of events and the gaps, not for totals.
Resultscampaign: 5 warm and 5 uncached reloads
| Warm reload | median 2.4 s, range 2.4 s–2.8 s; loads: 2.5 s, 2.4 s, 2.8 s, 2.4 s, 2.4 s |
| Uncached reload | median 2.6 s, range 2.5 s–2.9 s; loads: 2.9 s, 2.5 s, 2.8 s, 2.5 s, 2.6 s |
| Standing | 1 of 27 by median; possible rank 1 to 2. The fastest in its group. The possible rank is the range the measurements leave open: it counts only the exchanges that clearly beat this one and those it clearly beats. Exchanges whose ranges overlap cannot be told apart. |
| Loads ready | 5 of 5 warm, 5 of 5 uncached |
Where the time goescampaign medians, warm reload
Panels in the order they first showed real, usable data on a warm reload. The coloured part of each row is the time that panel added after the one before it. The last row is trade-ready: every panel is ready and the page has stopped moving.
Stack
Vue; TradingView chart library (library.js) from thalex.com; no third-party scripts at all.
Delivery
thalex.com through Cloudflare over HTTP/2; the HTML is marked no-cache and re-checked on each load (30 ms to the first byte); app files cached for ten years. In the 1 October capture only 14 KB was transferred, so although that capture was meant to be uncached, most files did not come over the network.
| Host | Role | CDN edge seen | Connect | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| thalex.com | page | Cloudflare Amsterdam | 13 ms | 25 ms |
Median of up to 10 attempts from the test machine. Response time includes the server's own time, so it is not a distance.
What happened, in orderdiagnostic capture 1 October, uncached
From one uncached diagnostic load recorded on 1 October 2026 (cache disabled, browser extensions active), so totals are slower than the campaign's timed loads; file names, sizes, headers, order of events and main-thread times are what the findings rely on. A main-thread time given for a script counts all the work that starts in that script, including code it calls in other files, so it shows where start-up work begins, not what one library costs. Endpoint paths were masked when the capture was saved.
| When | What |
|---|---|
| 0.03 s | HTML arrives. |
| 0.09–0.47 s | index-CKxRR9q7.js (1.5 MB unpacked), from cache. |
| 0.55 s | The market socket opens; handshake at 0.72 s; first message at 0.80 s. |
| 0.71 s | First paint. |
| 2.03 s | Page header shows the market. |
| 2.77 s | Price and order book show, 2.0 s after the first feed message. |
| 2.86 s | Chart drawn: trade-ready in this load. |
Recorded warm reload, 3 October
One warm reload recorded with Chrome's performance trace. Recording slows the page, so read the order and the gaps, not the total.
| When | What |
|---|---|
| 0.0 s | HTML arrives |
| 0.3 s | First market-data request |
| 0.4 s | First frame sent on a live feed |
| 0.4 s | First frame received on a live feed |
| 2.7 s | Price ready |
| 2.7 s | Order form ready |
| 3.3 s | Chart ready |
| 3.3 s | Order book ready |
| 3.3 s | Recent trades ready |
| 3.9 s | Trade-ready |
235 requests before trade-ready; 6 long main-thread tasks (over 50 ms) before trade-ready, longest 253 ms; 125 script requests before the first panel; 0 requests over HTTP/1.1.
Request waterfalldiagnostic capture 1 October, uncached
70 of the 134 requests (the page itself, the longest and the largest) started before market data was ready in the 1 October uncached capture, in start order. The outlined part of a bar is waiting for the server; the solid part is downloading. Rows are numbered so a request can be pointed to. The numbers on the right are the size received and the total time. Vertical lines mark when a panel had data in this capture.
PageScriptFont, media, other fileData requestwaiting for the serverdownloading
Bottlenecks and fixes, largest firstdiagnostic capture 1 October, uncached
- Evidence
- In the campaign the last panel (the chart in 4 of 5 warm loads, the order book in 1) has data at a median 1.76 s on a warm reload, and trade-ready follows at 2.45 s. The median wait before trade-ready, counted from the moment the page's main parts are in place, is 0.67 s, a quarter of Thalex's whole load time. In the slowest warm load the order book passed its check, failed it again for 0.5 s and passed once more, which delayed that load. In the recorded load and in all 10 timed loads we could replay, the readiness condition still failing during this wait is an animation running inside the chart panel; the panels do not move. Our records count the animated elements (3 in the recorded load) but do not keep their names. In 5 of the 10 timed loads the fonts were also still loading during the wait.
- Gap observed
- 0.67 s median wait before trade-ready, counted from when the main parts are in place
- Holds back
- Trade-ready itself: the page counts as ready only when nothing in a panel is still animating or loading.
- Fix
- Record a reload with DevTools → Animations and find what still animates in the chart after the candles are drawn, for example a toolbar loading spinner or a fade-in; end it when the data is in. Also check that the fonts are loaded before the panels show.
- Where
- The chart panel and its loading states.
- Verify
- DevTools → Animations during a reload: nothing in the chart container animates after the candles appear.
- Evidence
- The 3 October recorded warm load made 154 script requests, 125 of them before the price showed at 2.73 s. Almost all came from the browser's cache (209 of 263 requests), so download time is not the cost here. The longest main-thread task, 253 ms, starts at 0.45 s. All 10 timed loads show the same first second: 69 script requests in the first half second and 52 in the second.
- Gap observed
- 0.253 s of main-thread time in the longest task
- Holds back
- Every panel: nothing is shown before this ends.
- Fix
- Combine the start-up chunks the trading screen needs into a few files, and load the rest after the first price paint.
- Where
- Bundler chunking for the trading route.
- Verify
- DevTools → Network: script requests before the first price paint.
Grade B: the capture shows the problem directly. Grade C: the order of events in the capture points to it; the dependency is for the team to confirm. The order is our judgement of each finding's effect on trade-ready, largest first; it is not sorted by gap. A gap is the time between two observed events or the time one piece of work takes; gaps overlap and do not add up. Where a finding is about size or count and no time was measured, the row says what was measured instead. Holds back names the panel the finding delays. Nothing here is graded higher, because no fix was confirmed by changing a page and measuring again.
How this was measured
Timings: 5 warm and 5 uncached reloads in a seeded random order across all exchanges, each judged against a checklist frozen for this page before the campaign; trade-ready is the first moment every checklist panel shows real data, nothing is still loading, and the layout holds still for 0.5 s. The findings on this page come from separate recorded loads, which are never part of the timings. Full method.